*** QUICK TIPS ***

This page is to gather nuggets of useful ideas which I've found work
well when picketing, handing out flyers, or other discussions with the
public.  These comebacks can be useful when dealing with incredulous 
family, friends, police, doctors, or other authorities:

1.  When a visitor to a picket site walks up and asks what this
    is all about, I find that a short description like:  "It's
    about gang stalking and electronic weapons which can torture
    you through the walls of your house" gets the visitor's
    attention (as it should!)

2.  When a skeptic says he/she "just doesn't believe any of this",
    I've had success saying:  "Well, the U.S. Congress had a bill
    pending which proposed controls on electronic anti personnel
    weapon technology, and the Russian Parliament has passed a bill
    mentioning some of the technology into law.  The U.S. Congress
    retracted the specific references to electronic anti personnel
    weapons, but they would not have been there at all unless the
    electronic anti personnel weapons were known about by the sponsor."

    (It's the Russian Federal Weapons Law, Article 6.)

3.  When a skeptic says "If these weapons exist, then why don't
    they use 'em on so-and-so [Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein,
    Slobodan Milosevic, or any other bad guy in the headlines]?"

    Answer #1:  "How do you know he's not doing what the powers
    that be actually want to happen?"

    Just because he's at war with the U.S. doesn't mean he is
    necessarily not doing the U.S.'s bidding.  It's impossible
    to know if a given conflict is or is not part of a hidden
    agenda of U.S. leadership.  Leaders throughout history have
    started fights to gain power.  Even happens on school
    playgrounds."

    Answer #2:  "Probably because so-and-so [the bad guy] is doing
    things that our government feels are useful.  Not every goal
    of government is made public."

4.  When someone tries to snare you into saying you are talking about 
    the dreaded C-word, "conspiracy", say in response:  "No, actually 
    I call it CRIME."

    That has worked well and derails the skeptic's line of 
    interrogation.  If a naysayer refuses to accept that, remind him
    or her that every crime with two or more participants is a
    'conspiracy.'

5.  When challenged like this: "Well if gang stalking and electronic
    harassment is going on, how come I don't hear about it in the
    newspapers, on TV, or     on the radio?"

    Try this:  "International shortwave broadcasters DO talk about 
    gang stalking and electronic harassment."

    http://www.raven1.net/patriotradio.htm

    ...for details.

6.  When asked "So WHO exactly is doing this, and WHY?", I respond
    that first of all, we have no proof of EXACTLY who or why, but
    we do know that all levels of elected government provide air
    tight cover by way of denial and ridicule.  If government had
    no connection with these crimes, different agencies and people
    would show a variety of responses.  What we see are responses
    which are rigidly lock-stepped, a clear symptom of coordinated
    denial.

    I then say "It is the guess of many members of our group, and
    political researchers, that the world's ultra rich are behind
    the gang stalking and electronic harassment programs.  Since they
    'own' visible governments, they are the only group who could force
    government to such extreme denial and ridicule for decades."

    Congressman Ron Paul (Texas) spoke about such a covert coalition
    of the world's ultra rich and powerful here:

    http://www.raven1.net/ronpaulowg.htm"

    "George Bush SENIOR used to refer to 'the New World Order' but 
    was evasive about it's makeup and purpose.  This may be the
    secret name for the 'ruling ultra rich'.  My guess as to the 
    purpose is the age-old purpose of slavery, but using the newest
    technology, slavery in which the slaves don't know they are
    slaves."  Building a corps of high-tech equipped harassers,
    schooled in deception and cover, could be a way of preparing to
    neutralize resistance when the New World Order decides to go
    public.  This is similar to the Nazi brownshirts.

    "Another very likely purpose is large scale reduction of 
    population by way of withholding cures to major diseases and
    deliberately administering poisoned medicines and vaccines 
    which kill slowly so as not to arouse suspicion among the common
    people."

    There are other government and government-backed crimes happening
    which also point to an iron-fisted world dictatorship in the
    works:

    http://www.raven1.net/othcrime.htm

7.  When a visitor asks "So how many of you are there?"

    Answer:  "In March of 2002, Cheryl Welsh, founder of CAHRA,
    had been in touch with about 1,600 people world wide who
    state they are being targetted.

    Some statistics supporting a figure of around one person in a
    hundred are here:

    http://www.raven1.net/stats.htm

8.  When a skeptic says "You don't have any evidence", try this:

    "Since when did personal testimony stop being evidence?"

    "Either personal testimony IS evidence, or is NOT evidence.

    "If it is NOT evidence, then we must immediately nullify
    every single court case in which conviction was based on
    testimony.  Even PHYSICAL evidence does not get admitted
    into court unless someone's personal TESTIMONY confirms it.

    "If it IS evidence, then the matching accounts of several
    hundred witnesses world wide IS SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE.

    "Since courts use testimony as evidence, testimony IS
    evidence, and it cannot be said we don't have evidence."

    And do not forget the un-classified electronic weapon capable 
    devices available to the public.

    http://www.raven1.net/uncom.htm

9.  When the public asks "how do you know that someone is being
    targetted":

    - The QUICK answer is:  "If they are forced suddenly awake
      at exactly the same time every night, and that time is
      often exactly 2:00 am, 3:00 am or 4:00 am."

    - The MORE COMPLETE answer is:  "See  raven1.net
      and click on "Effects-Survey" and "Effects-Results"
      in the Main Menu on the cover page."

10. When asked "What can this stuff do to you?", try this:

    "It can destroy both your mental and physical health, and
    make it impossible to hold a job."

11. This is a response to a skeptic who asked "If there really
    WERE electronic weapons, wouldn't they have been used on the
    World Trade Center/Pentagon terrorists by now?"

    "The people who now possess electronic weapons were probably
    also in favour of the attacks.  Those attacks almost certainly
    served some secret purpose."

    "Electronic weapons can be used to control, and to distract,
    very efficiently, without the target having any awareness they
    are in use."

12. I sometimes try to speak in such a way as to paint MKULTRA and
    today's electronic weapon harassment as a long but SINGLE event.
    Although today, it appears that a very large number of groups
    have the electronic weapons, the MKULTRA-era (and COINTELPRO)
    crimes certainly appear to be a major source of what is
    happening today.  Such programs were discussed by congressional
    committees, but no decisions were ever made which could stop
    such covert activity.

    Since the 1977 Senate hearings did nothing to stop MKULTRA-era
    activity in the future, and in the late 1990s, the U.S.
    government backed out of the Nuremburg Protocols, there was
    nothing stopping continuation of the activity using electronics
    and in the private sector.

13. When skeptics imply that there is no difference between
    mind control and subliminal advertising, I ask them how
    they would like to be put into excruciating pain that no one
    in their vicinity could feel.  I ask them how in that situation
    they would enjoy being laughed at by their companions.

    Then I ask them how they would like it if this kept up for
    the rest of their life.

14. "Good news" is always welcome.  Tell the listener that the
    good news is that this entire mess can disappear like the
    early morning fog if the public were simply made fully aware
    of the full range of gang stalking crimes and the available
    electronic harassment technology.  This sounds too easy,
    but it works very well on the picket site and in my opinion
    is also true.

15. "Electronic weapons" is a darn good, quick way to describe the
    technology because it DOES NOT RULE OUT the CLASSIFIED technology.
    (By contrast, "electromagnetic" DOES rule out the classified
    technology and is not the best choice, in my opinion anyway.)

16. "Radar-based" is a darn good, quick way to describe the 
    electronic voice-to-skull technology if you only have someone's
    attention for a moment.  It is backed up by the Joseph Sharp
    success, at 
    v2succes.htm ...and is diagrammed on hypno2s.gif

16A. HOWEVER, it is wisest to NOT allow a visitor to walk away thinking
    that TODAY'S harassment equipment can be shielded against.  Our
    observations show clearly that TODAY'S signals can penetrate excellent
    conventional electromagnetic shielding, and cannot be detected using
    ordinary equipment.  Stray bits of microwave in the vicinty are not
    the same thing as signals which are locked in SYNCHRONIZATION with
    our effects.  Only one case of perfect synchronism is known, and in
    that case, commercially made faraday cages did not stop the
    harassment.

    The way I handle TODAY'S signals is to say to a visitor:

    "Today's signals ARE NOT ESP.  But today's signals BEHAVE MUCH
    LIKE ESP.  Like ESP, the signals are not stopped by electro-
    magnetic shielding.  Like ESP research, today's signals have
    not been detectable using conventional detection equipment.
    It is likely today's signals use a type of physics not known to 
    scientists without the highest security clearances."  

    That has not triggered any you-are-nuts responses because it 
    disclaims that ESP is being used for the advanced electronic
    attacks.

17. "Nobody, especially politicians and reporters, really wants to
    be the bearer of bad news", is a good quick response when asked
    why nobody is doing anything.  Undoubtedly true, too.

18. "To KINDLE public interest, in hopes they will press government
    for INVESTIGATION, DISCLOSURE and ENFORCEMENT" is a good quick
    way to say why you are out there with a picket sign.

19. Often you can tell that a visitor to your picket site is only
    looking for a really quick answer.  When they ask "What is
    gang stalking?", I reply:

    "Gang stalking is bullying by a group of people at home, out
    in the community, on the road, and at the workplace.  Electronics
    is sometimes used to make the harassment worse."

20. A colleague has observed that the victims of sexual abuse by 
    Catholic clergy are now believed.

    BELIEVED, in spite of the fact that what backs up their
    allegations was initially just the number of complaints.
    Eye witnessing was seemingly rare or non-existent, and
    there were no visible marks as far as I know.

    Just like us?

    This seems to me like one more helpful comeback when dealing 
    with a skeptical public, doctors, government agencies or
    police!

21. If the visitor appears to be SCHOOL AGE, I recommend you suggest
    that gang stalking and electronic harassment make a GREAT TERM
    PAPER TOPIC.  A number of books on these topice are referenced
    on our web site which the students can quote.

22. A skeptic may ask "What makes YOU so important that the perps
    would choose you for all this harassment?"

    I respond that a survey of 12,000 people in 2002 came back
    with about one person in a hundred saying they had most or all
    of the symptoms.  I'd say that one person in a hundred is also
    backed up by other statistics about workplace mobbing and
    stalking and harassment.  That's a lot of people, and many
    simply don't have a reason why.

    That is what is unusual about gang stalking and electronic
    harassment in the twenty first century.  We can't explain it.

23. Reminding your listener about this fact, from victim Roy Bercaw:

    "All too many people do not believe that something is real
     unless it is reported in the media."

24. If someone says you and/or other members of our group look/talk
    like nut cases, you can answer:

    "What you are seeing is an ENTIRELY JUSTIFIBLE REACTION to
    years of 24 hours a day harassment.  You would look the same
    if it were happening to you."

25. A good way to finish off your spiel, and this is entirely honest
    and no exaggeration, is to say "...and all we are really asking
    is that government do their jobs".

===========================================================================