Click to read review 000_002
Review posted November 21, 2008
Eleanor White rating: BOGUS (trivializes the crime) November 21, 2008 WEB SITE: SITE TITLE: Gang Stalking World EW: This well-executed web site rates a BOGUS because it misleads the visitor from the public into believing that targets of organized stalking and electronic harassment are worrying about things that are trivial and not serious, and in fact common occurrences of every day life. The destruction of careers, lies told in the community, sleep deprivation, ongoing sabotage of belongings while the target is away, breakup of marriages because only one spouse is harassed, loss of child custody when the target complains to officials - these things are glossed over and silly things are fronted as top concerns. Notice that prominently, at the top left, is a photo of a young mom pushing a stroller, talking on a cell phone. For theatrical effect, apparently, she is wearing a sort of "spy" outfit. This reviewer assures the reader that young moms with strollers do not send organized stalking targets into a tailspin. Next notice the very first, most prominent technique this site describes. The first item is presumably the one that causes targets of organized stalking the most grief. It is listed as "Air Stalking." In other words, the site cries out against aircraft stalking targets on the ground! That concern literally shouts "paranoia" to the world. While in some cases aircraft may be part of the harassment, there is just no way anyone in urban or dense suburban areas can possibly know why an aircraft is flying over. I do believe that a few targets have had aircraft used to harass them, because it is an ideal way to get the target to sound insane. However, "Air Stalking" is not a serious concern to the vast majority of organized stalking targets. It does NOT describe the experience of organized stalking accurately. The second item is "Brighting," that is, aiming bright lights at a target. Car lights, or sometimes bright lights from one apartment towards an apartment on a building next door. Here again, I've heard a few reports of "Brighting," but it's hardly a major concern for most targets. To prominently display "Brighting" as the second most grevious assault type is totally mis-representing organized stalking to the public. (On another site, no longer posted, the site's author showed many photos of cars doing ordinary things, claiming that simply driving along, or in one case, parking at home with the car door open, was harassment.) By the time a visitor to that site has seen the first three items, they could be forgiven for thinking organized stalking targets are crazy. This reviewer does not know the motive behind web sites or articles which trivialize organized stalking and electronic harassment. However, it is clear that the motive is not to assist in exposing and stopping the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment. Eleanor White ** ADDITIONAL ITEM - SEEMINGLY RELATED WEB SITE: WEB SITE: Eleanor White rating: BOGUS (leads the visitor to think "mental illness") May 18, 2010 This is another site which appears to be one in a series, another being gangstalkingworld.com The format and professional polish are very similar. First, "gang" stalking is a known confusing term which stops the listener/reader from learning about OS/EH while they try to figure out "which GANG is harassing us." Youth? Race? Biker? Mafia? The unaware public gives us about 30 seconds' worth of attention span in my experience. That term "gang" burns it up in a totally unnecessary side trip. (Just like "MONARCH" and "New Phoenix.") Secondly, just a quick glance at the first few frames in the "slide show", and the image of the guy in a suit looking over his shoulder at people who are probably his co-workers, leads me subtly but powerfully to the question "Are these people mentally ill?" If it leads me in that direction, it is likely to lead the public in that direction as well, in my opinion. Why bring up psychiatrists at all? Especially on the cover page. Why post a photo of a distressed individual with messy hair, which also hints at mental problems? Why bring mind control into the picture on the cover page? Mind control is a known turn-off term which often produces the 'wacko subject' response in listeners and readers. We do not need to raise the "mind control" issue to expose the BASIC crime. There are plenty of other through wall electronic effects we can present which are proven and have been around for decades. The webmaster even has a photo labelled "Paranoid and stressed" showing a distorted image of a stressed out target. This, like gangstalkingworld.com, in my personal opinion, is another very slick web site which suckers new targets into promoting it as a place to refer non-targets, when in fact it hints at mental illness. Hints pretty strongly in my opinion. I've seen enough, without reading it all in detail, to give it the same BOGUS rating as gangstalkingworld.com. The thing new targets need to know is that there are sites that combine a lot of valid information with discrediting "poison pills" in the form of confusing, misleading information which does things like hint at mental illness, or burn up attention span with confusing terms like "gang" stalking, "MONARCH", "New Phoenix," or bring in way too much of the exotic assault types than the visiting public can handle. If you don't know that, then you will refer non-targets to such sites, to our mutual detriment. The "poison pill" technique is ancient and standard for those wishing to deceive. Eleanor White