These advice points are the personal opinions of Eleanor White, who has been a electronic harassment & organized stalking target since 1980.
Apologies - this page started out "quick" but has grown as more inquiries have been received. This advice carries with it no guarantee of successful results.
If you, the reader, are new to the fight to expose and stop electronic harassment and organized stalking, I recommend you visit the glossary page. The following web site also contains valuable ideas for organized stalking and electronic harassment targets:
![]() |
Stop Covert War, Sueann Campbell's response to organized stalking and electronic harassment. See her Countermeasures (callnotes.html) page directly for additional ideas. |
How can I stop this harassment?
What do the perpetrators want from me?
Are there any successful countermeasures?
What if I'm forced to see a doctor?
How can I convince authorities, family, friends
and co-workers that I'm not crazy?
What kind of technology do the perps use?
When to use CONVENTIONAL vs. ADVANCED technology
The perps are really harassing me. Can I do anything to
get them to back off?
Is there any way to keep secrets from the perps?
I have an implant. How can I get it taken out?
Because of this, it is important for targets to accept that there
may be no solutions for the moment, and like the rest of us, will have
to endure the harassment while we work on finding solutions.
The reasons why we are not now able to prove our case in court are:
Having said all that, it's worthwhile to keep in mind that we DO have
evidence, and if some naysayer says you have none, you can rebut that.
Here are the types of evidence we do have:
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com
Refusal to even acknowledge first person evidence indicates strong bias.
http://www.raven1.net/uncom.htm
...for example.
http://mindjustice.org
COINTELPRO crimes are outlined in this book review:
http://www.raven1.net/warathom.htm
Personally, I, Eleanor White, believe that the shortest route to stopping
the harassment may be in the exposure of some of the other major government
crimes which are being covered up. The best source for news about those
other crimes are the 'Patriot' news broadcasts, which can be heard on
the WEB, shortwave, and on some AM and FM stations. See this page for
details:
http://www.raven1.net/patriotradio.htm
For a book providing good background information on how and why major
government crimes happen and continue decade after decade, see
Rule by Secrecy, by Jim Marrs. This book
and other sources show that often, world leaders get their positions
of power by way of membership in secret societies. Testimony by
government and corporate whistelblowers on Patriot radio shows that
positions of power in every level - federal, state, provincial, county
and local - are often filled by people with allegiances other than their
oath of office. In fact, investigators have turned up judges who have
skipped placing an oath of office on file, and are in actual fact not
legally exercising their functions. This type of covert corruption
provides an environment in which organized stalking and electronic harassment
can take place without fear of prosecution.
Toward this end, as much as my limited resources allow, I follow
news about the efforts to expose such other crimes,
and even participate in such exposure efforts where possible.
There is ONE possible method, somewhat expensive, time consuming,
which might begin to show the public that the electronic attacks are real.
That would be to acquire a single channel, PC-based, recording EEG
(electro-encephalogram) unit and use it while in bed. The EEG
indications would be recorded, along with voice notes from the target
describing the effects being experienced and the time, on an audio or
video recorder.
When dealing with hostile authorities, family, friends and the general
public, it is definitely worth mentioning EEG readings as a possible
way to produce the necessary evidence.
See "Well, what CAN we do then?" below, for a list
of some things we CAN do in spite of our disadvantages.
See: http://www.KI4U.com
MENU
Glossary of terms
Advice Points
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
How can I stop this harassment?
As of the date of this page, I (Eleanor White) do not know of any way
to stop the harassment. Furthermore, all indications so far are that the
harassment will continue for life.
http://www.raven1.net/othcrime.htm
This won't stop the harassment, but because of George W. Bush's
(and his New World Order masters')
insane plan to attack other countries, making major upheavals in the
world situation and even nuclear war a good possibility, I would
strongly urge 'making one's self right with God' through repentance
and prayer. It wouldn't cost anything for those who feel they are
'not religious' to hedge their bets in this manner too. I've been
doing just that, along with lots of reflective time
outdoors enjoying
what's left of Nature for some time now. (Might also be worth while
stocking up on storable food, acquiring some water containers, some
potassium iodate or iodide, perhaps a top quality water filter,
having materials on hand for a solar still.)
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
What do the perpetrators want from me?
The full answer is guesswork. In the beginning (decades ago), it
appeared this was sick psychological warfare "research". However,
with an April 2002 survey of 12,000 North Americans, it now appears
one percent of the population may be organized stalking and electronic
harassment targets. It is my (Eleanor White's) guess that what used
to be "mind control" has moved from "research" into a program to suppress
dissent and "neutralize" people considered as "undesirables", probably
part of the predicted takeover by the
New World Order. Naturally, the targets
on whom "research" was performed must be kept on the NWO list, to
keep them from being heard.
Evidence from targets indicates that training more perpetrators is proceeding quickly so as to expand this program. Since it takes a while for new targets to realize they are being deliberately targetted, this expansion hasn't showed yet in a major surge in new targets writing in. There has been, however a steady increase.
One thing the perpetrators want, a top priority item, is to confuse, discourage, and divide our group. One way to do this is to SIMULATE older technology, which will cause some of us to spend our last bit of time, last iota of strength, last dime, and last ounce of fighting spirit trying to buy cures for obsolete. Both audible sound and radio signals can be injected so as to appear at any point in space. This ability of the advanced technology fools many into thinking we are up against basic, conventional electromagnetic or acoustic signals. (conventional) technology. Keep in mind that if the perp technology was simple (like microwave), we would have found a solid countermeasure long ago.
One way to confuse, discourage and divide is to use different mind/body effects on different targets, spawning endless debates. (See Disinformation Agents and Facts, Fact Sources, and the "Poison Pill" Disinfo Tactic)
The fractionalizing tactic has been standard for government agencies and is clearly laid out in the book War at Home. Deception is the standard stock-in-trade of all government intelligence agencies. (This tactic began as FBI COINTELPRO)
Decoying and disinfo agents are ways the perps accomplish fractionalizing and keep the organized stalking and electronic harassment issue from being recognized by the general public.
Read this plea and view an illustration urging targets to never overlook the possibility of decoying in their lives: Click here.
In order to inoculate yourself against these tactics, I recommend that everyone remind themselves frequently that the perpetrators goals include deception and fractionalizing of our group. I plead with everyone to never forget those goals.
* One recurring report from targets is that their perps' voice to skull transmissions indicate the target is being used as the "ball" in a sick "betting game". The game, according to some reports, involves the application of some form of torture or skit, and the perp players bet on how the target will react. Thinking about illegal amusement like cock fights, this does sound plausible.
On the other hand, experimentation, as long as the target is fully
aware that any experiment may prove useless, and can afford to lose
the money and time invested, may turn something up in spite of the very
advanced nature of today's electronic harassment weapons.
There are some indirect areas where experimentation using conventional
equipment might turn up some useful results:
This type of experiment would require looking for statements by
psychics or scientific psychic researchers on what they have found
interferes with psychic abilities, (nicknamed "psi".)
This book review may give the reader
some clues about equipment which has been successful in serious
ghost and paranormal investigations.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
Are there any successful countermeasures?
This is a balancing act to try to answer. On the one hand, it is very
important that targets understand that conventional signals (microwave,
acoustics, ELF, lasers, etc.) are obsolete, and any experiments
attempting to block or jam or detect conventional harassment
signals will probably fail, and, targets can easily throw away their
life savings, time, strength and hope and come up with nothing, as I
(Eleanor White) did in the late 1990s.
This page of the Stop Covert War web site,
http://www.stopcovertwar.com/detect.html has been set up to track experiments which have
been or currently are being done to find genuine countermeasures.
apackrat@gbronline.com, packrat@650dialup.com, packrat@softhome.net to reach the webmaster of that site, if you have additional information to report.
What is key to understanding the question of obsolete vs. today's advanced technologies is to know that advanced technologies can and do DELIVER conventional electromagnetic and acoustic manifestations into targets' homes and bodies. But these conventional manifestations DO NOT TRAVEL in conventional form, and the manifestations canNOT cause all the effects we experience.
The advanced technology delivers the the conventional manifestations with the precision of a hypodermic syringe. This is cause for considerable confusion, as when targets use, perhaps, a Tri-Field Meter or similar device which registers electromagnetic or other conventional fields at the site of a perp attack. They may find unusual conventional fields, but that doesn't mean those fields travelled into the target's home or body in that form, or that the particular signal detected is causing the attack effects.
To actually USE a meter or other test equipment reading as proof is very difficult. Unless this reading ALWAYS shows in perfect synchronization with bodily or attacks on other objects, and such reading type can be CONSISTENTLY REPEATED by other targets, such a reading is almost certainly not usable as proof of attack.
It is worth noting that conventional electromagnetic manifestations routinely occur during ghost appearances and activity, and this is another example of conventional EM fields which are not delivered by way of their conventional form. (In fact, I Eleanor White recommend considering a request to local ghost investigators to scan the homes of targets. Possibly targets with basic items like tape recorders and camcorders might try to trap perp activity using electronic voice and image phenomena techniques.)
Here are a few successful partial relief countermeasures, such as:
The perps can render these and any other countermeasures useless if they are really determined to do so. I recommend these criteria for deciding if a given countermeasure you try actually works, or is a decoy:
One target tried different metallic head shielding types. She reported that the perps would "tap" (an example of remote physical action) on the shield several times before they finally "got through" and zapped her. Other experiments have shown that conventional shielding does not stop the harassment for many, meaning, the perps can get by metallic shields whenever they want to. Therefore, one has to ask: Was the tapping-then-zapping decoying? The target who reported it does not think so, however, to me it certainly seems like decoying. The purpose being to encourage ever more extensive and expensive shielding experiments, which give the perps more chances to show the target has no way to escape, while at the same time, causing the target to spend lots of time, hope and money for nothing.
If you are interested, here are some books describing scientific experiments which are aggressively ignored by 'mainstream' scientists, and which demonstrate clearly the performance level of current-day electronic harassment technology:
New organized stalking and electronic harassment targets need to learn just
how forcefully any new technologies are suppressed, and those three books
above contain prime examples. People trying to publicize or commercially
develop advanced technology are usually harassed just as we are.
For one thing, ALL medical symptoms can be applied electronically, but
if you have severe symptoms, just on the chance it may be a real medical
condition and not an electronic attack, it's smart to get it checked by
a doctor.
When you see a medical doctor, I, Eleanor White, recommend you do NOT
say the symptoms came from electronic or any form of deliberate
harassment. Instead, I recommend describing the symptoms and leaving
it up to the doctor to speculate about the cause.
If you are already seeing a psychiatrist, or are afraid you might be,
this web site is MUST READING:
Here is the May 2004 cover page in case the
link above doesn't work. May give you some clues for further web
searching.
Organized stalking and electronic harassment programs are harassment and
torture, not mental illness. The only exception to staying away from
psychiatrists should be the rare instance in which a local lawyer with
a mental health defence sub-specialty recommends an honest psychiatrist
who will not label you "in need of help" with a hair trigger diagnosis.
Such psychiatrists are rare.
I strongly urge all
targets to take advantage of lawyers' "free 30 minutes" to window
shop for a lawyer who takes legal aid cases and who has a mental
health defence sub specialty. And if the lawyer can recommend an
honest psychiatrist who will not assume that government harassment
is impossible, it might be prudent to quietly have yourself assessed
before some crisis occurs in your life. Listen to your instincts
and do not rush to have a mental health assessment, however.
IMPORTANT: You must control your natural hope and expectations so
that you do not expect either a sympathetic lawyer or honest
psychiatrist to become an activist on your behalf. Don't overstay
your welcome, don't send them lots of correspondence, don't pester
them in any way. Your purpose is to have some contacts handy should
the perps put you into a crisis situation.
Secondly, (and this is hard for people who have recently realized that
they are being harassed illegally,) I recommend that you avoid complaining
to anyone about anything that you cannot prove with courtroom
quality physical evidence. Ripped clothing, broken furniture,
slashed tires, for example. Complaining about any of the bodily effects
puts you in danger of being forced under the "care" of a psychiatrist,
which will discredit you for years to come.
If you are already seeing a psychiatrist, or are afraid you might be,
this web site is MUST READING:
Here is the May 2004 cover page in case the
link above doesn't work. May give you some clues for further web
searching.
One special point should be noted. Electronic harassment targets are
targets of CRIME, and NOT ANY KIND OF MEDICAL CONDITION. Disinformation
agents will often try to derail serious talk about electronic harassment
using medical conditions, "electrosensitivity" being very popular. If
someone is shot dead, the fact that they may have been allergic to lead in
NO WAY reduces the CRIME of murder. When "electrosensitivity" pops
into the conversation, I plainly and emphatically state that has
nothing to do with the CRIME of electronic harassment, will not debate
that issue further. I recommend this tactic to others.
Required reading. This is a statement
by a doctor who worked for the U.S. National Institutes of Health who
describes in his own words what psycho-electronic attack is all
about, and who has had personal experiences with it. Along with that
letter, Dr. Eldon Byrd's corroborating
statement, is a must. ** Consider printing out both of these
letters, and possibly making copies for any doctors you have dealt with
on the subject of electronic harassment. The "Required reading" letter
is the most powerful and corroborated statement about mind control we have
to date.
Electronic harassment is virtually always accompanied by organized
stalking (in-community harassment by groups of people) and mobbing (on
the job harassment). Convincing others that this non-electronic phase
of the problem is really going on and affects many people is, I feel, the
more important half of the job of convincing others. Here are some
statistics which have helped convince people that at least organized
stalking is reality:
** A survey like the one on this site was posted on a high volume news
site in 2002. 12,000 people visited that survey in 24 hours. About 120
sent in responses saying they had most or all of the signs of organized
stalking. That is 1 person in a hundred, primarily in North America.
(Probably better to estimate one person per 1,000.)
http://www.raven1.net/emresul2.htm
** Statistics from the book "Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American
Workplace show that in Sweden, about 3.5% of the working population is
subject to mobbing, which is organized stalking in the workplace. 3.5% of
working people is roughly 1 person in a hundred total, and is in line
with the organized stalking survey above.
http://www.raven1.net/mobbook.htm
** Statistics from the British (government) Home Office state that
990,000 people in the United Kingdom are targets of stalking or harassment
at any one time as of the year 2000. That is about 1.4 people per hundred.
Here again, the organized stalking survey's 1 person in a hundred is not out of
line. This information was posted on the cover page of a British
international detective and security agency at this link in January 2005.
Click here
for the (long) URL of that web site, as of early 2005.
Click here for information on disinformation
agents, who are always around, in the print media, in email forums on
organized stalking, electronic harassment, mind control, or on the talk radio
circuit.
This is a roughly 500 page book. Along with the DSM IV you will find
accessory books like "annotations" or "case studies", but you want
the actual DSM IV, not the accessories.
Go into the table of contents, and look for chapters with these
key words: "schizophrenia", "paranoid", and "delusional".
Scan the related topics and sub-topics, watching for CRITERIA used
by psychiatrists to diagnose (i.e. label) you with these particular
conditions. You will be AMAZED at how the behaviour of any organized
stalking and electronic harassment target fits PERFECTLY with the
criteria listed. The lesson to be learned here - see for yourself,
don't take my word on it - is that in our particular situation, ANY
contact with doctors and particularly psychiatrists is almost a
guarantee of a false diagnosis of "schizoid", "paranoid" or
"delusional" mental disorder.
This short experience - shouldn't take more than an hour - will
equip you for dealing with, should you be forced, or avoiding,
contact on the subject of organized stalking and electronic
harassment with the medical profession.
** And by the way, SOME doctors have admitted to our members that
they know for certain organized stalking and electronic harassment
are actually happening. See this log for more information:
Some of the worst things to complain about to others are:
Especially important is to avoid complaining about the motives
of local perpetrators. That is one of the main traps the perps set for
us. Someone else's motive is nearly impossible to prove, even if you
know that the motive is participation in the gang stalking and electronic
program.
Having said that, the odds are that by the time a new target reads
this advice, they have already been suckered into complaining about
the bodily effects (which are nearly impossible to support with
physical evidence) and may have already been in contact with the
psychiatric system, and may have already been labelled by family,
friends, and co-workers as crazy.
The way out of this type of discreditation is long and hard, but it
can be done by spending your time and resources doing all you can to
learn about FACTS ON PUBLIC RECORD
(which does not include our own
torment, as it hasn't been proven anywhere, sad to say) which point
to the availability and use of
psycho-electronic weapons and
their use on involuntary experimentees:
...and the fact that there are no controls on owning or using these
devices.
As you read and learn the history of on-public-record proven
gang stalking and electronic harassment instances and equipment,
I strongly recommend keeping a personal list of questions you have
encountered or might encounter, and well thought out and researched
comebacks to those questions. Rehearse those questions and
comebacks frequently, and keep adding to the list.
One way to test your comebacks is to join one of the email forums
on which targets discuss their situation, and ask for their
opinions.
One common challenge you may have already heard is for the authorities,
family, friends, or members of the public to say: "You are paranoid."
You can answer like this, (if the situation seems appropriate): "The fact
that YOU are UNWILLING to learn about the full history of gang stalking
and electronic harassment in no way makes ME PARANOID!"
(Courtesy Dr. Stanley Monteith, Patriot radio
broadcaster. His show title is "Radio Liberty", weekday evenings.)
Some other questions and comebacks I've encountered while picketing are
listed on this page: spiel.htm Those deal
mainly with electronic harassment, which is a main topic of this site.
Always keep in mind these potential considerations and pitfalls:
Here are some of the observed effects of the advanced electronic
technology which show conventional technology is not in use:
One recommendation is: Avoid tying any complaints you might
make down to any single type of technology. If you complain to the
authorities that you are being targetted by "satellites" or
"implants" or "microwave" or any other SPECIFIC type of technology,
you have just made it much easier for the authorities to discredit
you.
The authorities can xray you for implants and find none, or sweep
your home for microwave and find none, or point a signal analyzer at
the sky and find nothing out of the ordinary, and you are then
discredited, and to some extent so are the rest of us.
The honest position is that we do NOT know how the genuine,
current-day technology works. We DO know that today's technology
operates at an extremely sophisticated performance level. For example:
I did try a 4-layer shielded cylinder surrounding my bed, for a period
of two years. The 4 layers, outside first, were:
- Solid sheet steel
Air was provided by way of an intake duct and exhaust duct, solid
sheet steel, lined with radio signal absorbtive foam, and stuffed with
copper scrubbing pads.
Battery operated AM, FM, and shortwave radios, and a battery operated
TV set, and a cell phone, did not work inside this enclosure at all.
In fact, they didn't work even when the enclosure door was open,
probably due to the effects of the inner radio absorbtion layer.
All effects, including some of the above list of advanced effects,
continued without the slightest reduction within this enclosure.
Never forget that technology more advanced than that taught in
universities CAN IMITATE older, conventional technology. Common sense
tells you that the perpetrators WILL at times imitate obsolete technology
to confuse and divide those fighting electronic harassment.
The lesson, as I (Eleanor White) see it is refer only to "unknown
technology" rather than trying to explain to authorities technology
details you do not have absolute proof of. Do see this letter from
former USAF physicist Dr. Tom Bearden who has experienced some advanced
electronic attacks: tb2margo.htm
To read some historical information leading up to such advanced
electronic harassment technology, I recommend these books:
CONVENTIONAL technology has one PRIME USE for which
it is IDEAL: Engaging public interest and non-abusive interest
of the authorities.
If one CALMLY can list a few of the well-proven UNclassified
technologies and their known effects to the authorities or the
public, (probably in the context of urging controls on them,)
one can likely make headway. Some of my favourites among the
UNclassified weapons are:
- http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm (Joseph Sharp V2S)
So a big ***YES***, CONVENTIONAL technology has a place
and that place is engaging and educating the public and authorities,
but NOT planning countermeasures against the attacks.
ADVANCED techology's place is to aid us in DECISION MAKING.
By that I mean, if a target knows the full extent of the current-day
equipment capabilities, that target is going to be far more cautious
and circumspect in spending money, time, strength and hope on
various countermeasure candidates.
By keeping in mind the abilities of the ADVANCED technology,
a target can avoid the crushing HOPLESSNESS that happens
when an expensive radio frequency shielding suit he/she just
bought doesn't work. Or when a target moves to Surtsey Island
in the far north Atlantic and still gets harassed, at least that
target will have known all along that failure was a possibility and
it won't be a big a shock or discouragement.
By keeping the abilities of ADVANCED technology clearly in
mind, targets will automatically make GUARDED, conservative
statements to the public which do NOT TIE THEM DOWN to
one particular technology, which can lead to being shot down
by perp experts at exactly the wrong time (like a court hearing).
The target will keep the technology an OPEN-ENDED question
and by so doing, exhibit HONESTY. Appearing honest and not
claiming more knowledge than is available is very important in
building credibility of both the individual and group as a whole.
There is also no way you can "give them what they want" so as to
cause them to reduce or stop harassing you. "What they want" is to
harass and torture you.
Furthermore, the technology is highly exotic, can penetrate
electromagnetic shielding and can evade conventional electronic
detection equipment. This sophistication, and reports by many
targets make it wise to NOT assume you are implanted unless
you have unmistakeable x-ray proof.
The proposed airport "criminal intent scanners" do not require implants.
ESP and remote viewing do not require implants. UFO abductees report
powerful control over their actions even before they have been implanted.
In other words, very advanced effects can be accomplished without having
implants.
It is highly probable that the brain's natural electric currents
and corresponding magnetic fields serve today's advanced equipment
as the tracking and thought reading/writing "implant". After all,
"brain fingerprinting" is being developed in the unclassified
world.
(It is possible to have a non-metallic implant which may not
show on an x-ray too.)
If you make claims that you are implanted, and later on, the
authorities have you x-rayed and find nothing, you have discredited
yourself and in some degree the rest of us too. Yes, a few targets
do have implants, but they are far from the majority. Most of the
implant photos available are on the Mind Control Forum at this link:
http://www.mindcontrolforums.com
The only source I am aware of for implant removal is a podiatrist
who has arranged for some implant removal from UFO abductees. He
does not do the surgery, rather, he has surgical associates who do
the actual work. No electronic harassment target I'm aware of has
successfully approached Dr. Leir and arranged for a mind control
implant's removal.
Dr. Leir has a web site at:
Here is a writeup by someone familiar with
Dr. Leir's work, describing what's been happening with some of the UFO
implants he's removed to date.
http://www.nidsci.org/articles/metal/metal.html
... for limited analysis of SOME of the known UFO implants.
I don't know if implantee David Larson is receiving the full harassment
we are, but he has an impressive report on some involuntary implants he
had removed here:
http://www.us-government-torture.com/Larson%20Report%20Edit.pdf
** IMPORTANT: I do NOT have contact information for Mr. Larson.
This list is enough to keep us all productively busy in spite of what
the perps have done to keep the public distracted.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
What if I'm forced to see a doctor?
There may be times when perpetrator attacks produce symptoms so severe
that visits to a medical doctor become necessary. It is important to
understand that the OVERWHELMING majority of MDs will instantly diagnose
you as delusional if you try to tell them your symptoms are attacks from
hidden electronic equipment, government agencies, or that you are being
gassed or poisoned, or even experience 'strange smells'.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
How can I convince authorities, family, friends
and co-workers that I'm not crazy?
First, I recommend that targets stay away from from psychiatrists. These
doctors have no inside information about stalking groups or training in
government black operations and are not "in the loop" i.e. updated on
government black operations. Thus when they offer the opinion that organized
stalking and electronic harassment is not happening and you are
delusional, they are exceeding their professional qualifications
(and may be technically guilty of malptractice.)
Here is something VERY worthwhile for new targets to do before
making any kind of report or complaint to the authorities, and that
includes all doctors: Visit a large general, or possibly better, medical
school library, and locate the current "DSM" or "Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders". At time of writing, the
current version is IV, and it's commonly referred to as the "DSM IV",
which is spoken as "DSM Four".
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
What kind of technology do the perps use?
I (Eleanor White) do not know how the genuine, current-day, classified
(secret) technology works. I know, from personal experience and the
effects reported by other targets that we are not being targetted by
simple conventional technology.
(Or at least, the perps have very advanced technology to use if they
feel they need it, so conventional countermeasures are to me a waste
of time and money.)
- Aluminum foil
- Galvanized steel mesh
- Radio signal absorbtive foam
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
When to use CONVENTIONAL vs. ADVANCED technology:
I advise that the actual uses a target makes of what they know about
CONVENTIONAL technology, and what they know about ADVANCED technology,
are VERY DISTINCT AND DIFFERENT:
- http://www.raven1.net/lida.htm (Russian LEE-da machine)
- http://www.raven1.net/5159703.htm (Lowery Silent Sound)
- http://www.raven1.net/silsoun2.htm (Silent Sound in Iraq)
- http://www.raven1.net/seethru.jpg (Through wall radar)
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
The perps are really harassing me. Can I do anything to
get them to back off?
There is no way to appease the perps that I (Eleanor White) am aware
of. Hiding and not going public does not cause the harassment to
back off, based on what I've heard and read.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
Is there any way to keep secrets from the perps?
In my (Eleanor White's) opinion, there is no type of communications
which is secure from the perps. Encryption, secure servers, avoidance
of the Internet do not prevent the perps from knowing what you are
thinking. There is a faint possibility that if you have an
idea which is not ever "said silently
to yourself", the perps may not be able to monitor such non-
vocalized thoughts. This is not assured as of the date of this
document, however.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
I have an implant. How can I get it taken out?
Many targets assume that because they are tracked, their thoughts read,
and are targetted in other ways, they must have implants. Newly aware
targets need to realize that many targets have never had surgery,
unexplained wounds, or lost time, and therefore are confident they do
NOT have implants.

Here above is x-ray proof, provided by target John Gregory Lambros.
This advice carries with it
no guarantee of successful results.
Well, what CAN we do, then?"
Over the past few years, I've been in the unhappy position of
explaining to new target correspondents what we CAN'T do, and why.
Here are some things I feel we canNOT do, and of course, this is
just one person's opinion:
I think it's probably time to set up a list of what we CAN do for
those same new correspondents. Again, this is only one person's
opinion here, but I think there are some positive things we can do,
while the media and the "war on terrorism" keeps the public's
attention tied up: